PDA

View Full Version : Mahathir the blogger



pywong
27th October 2008, 03:47 PM
In case anyone doubts this, he posts the comments, by the dozens and
hundreds, page after page, day after day. It turns out he has a lot of fans
out there.

"Amazingly brilliant!" reads one comment. "I can't stop laughing... you made
my day Sir!"

"HAHAHAHA :) ...This is your BEST posting so far, my dear Tun!!" reads
another, referring to Mahathir by an honorific.

"Dearest Tun," reads another, "You are sooooo right.. spot on.. bulls eye.."

And just to clear up any possible misunderstanding, another writes: "You,
sir, are the most brilliant politician Malaysia has ever been blessed with."

If one is dumb, arrogant or deluded enough, he will believe any rubbish his sycophants lavish on him.

http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/10/26/asia/blogger.php

Ex-leader uses blog to needle Malaysian government
By Seth Mydans Sunday, October 26, 2008

KUALA LUMPUR: In a vast office at the top of one of the world's tallest
buildings, former Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad sits at a broad,
glass-topped desk, scribbling his thoughts on a pad of unlined paper.

For 22 years Mahathir was the most powerful person in this land, and his
thoughts were commands as he reshaped the country in his own grand image.

But he has become an irritant and a spoiler five years after stepping down,
turning against his handpicked successor, Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, and he has
fallen victim to the press controls he perfected as prime minister.

It is mainly a system of self-censorship in an atmosphere of pressure and
intimidation that produces an obedient press and has seen the closure or
banning of many publications.

"Where is the press freedom?" he exclaimed two years ago, apparently
surprised to be suddenly ignored. "Broadcast what I have to say! What I say
is not even accurately published in the press!"

Earlier this year, like many other inconvenient critics, he joined what
seems to be a political wave of the future, creating his own acerbic blog -
www.chedet.com - an online journal where he vents in both English and Malay
several times a week.

Around the region, bloggers like him are becoming a fifth estate,
challenging the government's monopoly on information in Singapore, evading
censors in Vietnam and influencing events in places like Thailand, Cambodia
and China.

In March, political experts say, Malaysia's bloggers helped tip the balance,
contributing to the biggest upset the governing party, the United Malays
National Organization, had suffered since independence in 1957. For the
first time in decades, it fell below two-thirds of the seats in Parliament,
and it lost control of 5 of 13 states.

Two months after that, in May, Mahathir went digital, cutting and thrusting
with elan.

"It is time the so-called intellectuals realize they were being duped by the
Master of Spin," he wrote on Aug. 21, referring to his bitter enemy, Anwar
Ibrahim, who was his deputy prime minister and now leads the opposition.

"The pious Muslim, who is also the bosom pal of Paul Wolfowitz, the neo-con
Jew, the killer of Muslims," he said, referring to the former U.S. deputy
secretary of defense.

Blogging on Sept. 3, he offered a sort of mission statement.

Many people are with him as he harasses the government, he asserted. "But
they are not prepared to say it openly. That was why I started my blog.
About six million had visited my blog site and tens of thousands have
commented and supported me."

In case anyone doubts this, he posts the comments, by the dozens and
hundreds, page after page, day after day. It turns out he has a lot of fans
out there.

"Amazingly brilliant!" reads one comment. "I can't stop laughing... you made
my day Sir!"

"HAHAHAHA :) ...This is your BEST posting so far, my dear Tun!!" reads
another, referring to Mahathir by an honorific.

"Dearest Tun," reads another, "You are sooooo right.. spot on.. bulls eye.."

And just to clear up any possible misunderstanding, another writes: "You,
sir, are the most brilliant politician Malaysia has ever been blessed with."

In the upheaval of the March election, several bloggers, following an
opposite trajectory from that of Mahathir, used their online popularity to
win seats in the national or state parliaments.

The most prominent was Jeff Ooi, 52, a former advertising copywriter who was
one of Malaysia's first political bloggers, in 2003, at www.jeffooi.com.

"The government doesn't have a clue how to handle bloggers," he said in an
interview. "If I were a dictator I would be despairing. What do you do
against this?"

The government's assault on Ooi - "very hostile," he said - included threats
of imprisonment without trial, attacks in the government-friendly press and
defamation lawsuits, which are popular among leaders in Southeast Asia.

But that only seemed to make him a hero, and when he decided to run for
Parliament with the opposition Democratic Action Party, he already had a big
head start.

"As a person that has consistently faced threats as a blogger, I had a kind
of iconism and imagery that this is someone you can trust, someone the
government fears, someone you need to put into Parliament," he said.

But he said it is much harder to blog from the inside. "The trade-off is
that I have to write with measured words," he said. "I am no longer my old
self. I thought I had to take it to a higher level, and a lot of readers are
getting disappointed. It isn't the same blogger that they used to know."

Earlier this year, Ooi said, he attended a public forum with Mahathir, and
he claims that he is the one who persuaded the old war horse to get
blogging.

"I threw him a challenge," Ooi said. "A blogger shares a few prerequisites.
One, he is strongly opinionated. Two, he could be controversial. And,
thirdly, he is an agent provocateur on issues.

"I thought Mahathir fulfilled all three."

The result, Ooi said, was "a miracle, he scored about 10 million visitors
within months."

Now, a convert to free speech, Mahathir is using his blog to champion the
most recent victim of government censorship, Raja Petra Kamaruddin, the
country's highest-profile blogger, who posts his slash-and-burn commentary
on his site, www.malaysia-today.net. The site has been blocked, but readers
are redirected to another address, which continues to be updated.

The government has fallen back on the kind of tactics that Ooi said it
threatened against him, charging Raja Petra with sedition and locking him up
for two years without trial for comments he has posted.

Mahathir, the country's former strongman, sounded almost like Che Guevara
when he said in his blog that the arrest showed "a degree of oppressive
arrogance worthy of a totalitarian state."

Furthermore, locking people up is futile, he said in an interview in his
sky-high office. There is no way the government can arrest all the bloggers,
even if it wants to.

At least, he said, "I hope so. Otherwise I'll be in, too."

pywong
27th October 2008, 03:48 PM
Bloggers Reminded To Exercise Caution
http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v3/news_lite.php?id=366947

pywong
27th October 2008, 03:52 PM
Who's minding your manners?

Oct 27, 2008
SOAP BOX
Who's minding your manners?
Programming may have hard-wired youth into robots without free will
By Tan Weizhen
AS CHILDREN of the digital revolution, we're not used to waiting around for anything.

We click, post and send, and tend to be very raw online, posting and tagging pictures, flaming people - you've heard it all.

It is one thing for the facelessness and immediacy of the Internet to turn many rash youth into a bunch of click-happy misanthropes prone to cyber-wrongdoing. It's quite another for us to rely on it to teach us right from wrong.
But on the no-limits information autoban, there eventually had to be some

http://www.straitstimes.com/Breaking%2BNews/Tech%2Band%2BScience/Story/STIStory_295361.html

pywong
27th October 2008, 03:54 PM
What lies ahead for Malaysian media?
Published 25 October 2008

http://mustafakanuar.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/what-lies-ahead-for-malaysian-media/

There'll be a forum, themed 'Trends and Future of the Malaysian Mass Media',
on Oct. 30 at Universiti Malaya in Kuala Lumpur that promises to enlighten
Malaysians about the future of the country's mainstream media in the face of
what is considered as 'challenges' from the new media.

Curious and concerned Malaysians may find at this forum some answers to
questions that have been residing in their heads. For instance, what kind of
changes that the mainstream media have gone through ever since the emergence
of the new media particularly during the Reformasi movement?; to what extent
have the new media posed a challenge to the mainstream media?; how far is it
true that the credibility of the mainstream media reached a low point that
in turn precipitated the popularity of the new media among concerned
Malaysians; do repressive laws such as the PPPA, OSA and ISA play a role in
'domesticating' and nurturing a culture of excessive self-censorship within
the mainstream media?; and can a media council help promote professionalism
and public standing of the mainstream media within the present political
environment?

A Bernama report also mentioned a number of speakers for the forum, namely
blogger 'Rocky', president of the National Union of Journalists Norila Daud,
group chief editor of The Star Wong Chun Wai, head of Department of Media
Studies of Universiti Malaya Prof Dr Azizah Hamzah, chief editor of Sin Chew
English language portal Bob Teoh, Bernama editorial adviser Azman Ujang,
secretary-general of the Asian Media Information & Communication Centre
(AMIC) Assoc. Prof. Indrajit Banerjee, and advocate & solicitor Bhag Singh.

Given that the forum will discuss the challenges supposedly posed by the new
media to the mainstream media, I wonder whether certain luminaries of the
blogging community, such as Haris Ibrahim, Malik Imtiaz Sarwar, Jeff Ooi,
Susan Loone, Anil Netto, Patrick Teoh, 'Zorro', and representatives of the
late MGG Pillai (of the Sangkancil fame) and Raja Petra Kamaruddin, to name
but a few, would be there too.

The forum is jointly organised by the South-South Information Gateway
(SSIG), a unit under the Ministry of Information that was set up to foster
greater flow of information among developing nations, and Universiti Malaya.

SSIG stated that the forum was to mark World Development Information Day
(WDID) instituted by the United Nations in 1972.

pywong
27th October 2008, 03:57 PM
http://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/91881

LETTERS: Malaysiakini wasn't born in a government hospital
Helen Ang | Oct 24, 08 5:00pm

I refer to the New Straits Times article Malaysiakini grovels like a
teenager in trouble by Azmi Anshar.
http://www.nst.com.my/Current_News/NST/Wednesday/Frontpage/

To be clear on this, I'm not giving excuses for Malaysiakini's lapse in
judgment and procedural error with regard to the Najib Razak episode. It was
an editorial gaffe, no question about that.
http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/91725

And I can see where Azmi is coming from when he says, '... it was not so
much a case of publish and be damned as it was a routine that was all in a
day's work'.

The gist of Azmi's contention is that the report on the purported 'Najib
manifesto' was 'published all too casually' because doing so is right up
Malaysiakini's alley.

The 'anti-establishment' tag has long dogged Malaysiakini; its co-founder
Steven Gan had to once again address the charge in a new book interview:

'I always explain when people ask me what is Malaysiakini's agenda, I would
tell them Malaysiakini is non-partisan, in the sense that we do not support
any political parties. When it comes to elections, we say vote opposition,
we don't say vote PAS, vote DAP.

'We ask people to vote opposition to make sure that we have a stronger
opposition in order to provide checks and balances.'

But Steven conceded that 'Malaysiakini readers tend to be a little bit more
pro-opposition'. Please allow me to put a context to this.

When Malaysiakini started, it was to bridge the gaps. If the mainstream
media (MSM) had in the first place given fair airing to the opposition,
Malaysiakini would not have had traction or taken off.

Malaysiakini was not born in a government hospital simply because the
unequal coverage existing back then required it to tell the other side of
the story.

Contrary to Azmi's assertion, Malaysiakini faces a real problem of
logistics. Unlike the newspapers, Malaysiakini does not have bureaus in the
states. Its operations are confined to the Klang Valley, and hence its tone
largely that of federal politics.

Malaysiakini likes to complain it's got little money - lack of resources
makes it a David against the Goliath juggernaut of funds and other forms of
support, including corporate networking, that MSM is granted.

Constraints to access are genuine. Malaysiakini was once barred from
covering Umno press conferences and police functions. Until March 8
happened, it did not receive media accreditation, meaning, Malaysiakini
reporters were not recognised as journalists and allowed to do their jobs
unimpeded.

You can imagine also how government departments and personnel, and other
authorities, would cautiously keep Malaysiakini staff at arm's length.

It is unfair of Azmi to say that Malaysiakini's journalistic credo is 'to
err towards gung-ho recklessness'. Don't blame the annual print licence
restriction for the relative openness of Malaysiakini (it does not require
one).

Malaysiakini did want to join the Suratkhabar Club; its application to
publish has never been approved and is still in cold storage. Nor is it that
Malaysiakini circumvents censorship in cyberspace, merely the case that it
does not practise self-censorship to the emasculating extent the MSM does.

People can sue Malaysiakini and they have. Police can take action against
Malaysiakini and they have too, when they wouldn't otherwise against Utusan
Malaysia and other Barisan Nasional assets. So just because Malaysiakini is
not ink-and-newsprint does not automatically make it irresponsible.

As for the allegation that Malaysiakini is so one-tracked and it can't
report in any other way, here's a D-I-Y test. Write an anti-opposition
'Letter to the Editor' to Malaysiakini and see whether it is not published.
Be critical of the government and see if the newspapers allow you a full
say.

Nowadays, government figures are appearing plenty on Malaysiakini pages. A
whole gamut of BN top leaders - present and retired - have been interviewed.
In earlier times, they would not have touched Malaysiakini with a barge
pole. During its wilderness years, Malaysiakini took what it could get, such
as sourcing Dr Mahathir Mohamed (in his own recent period as an outsider).

On the other hand, were the likes of Lim Kit Siang and Abdul Hadi Awang -
let's not even mention Anwar Ibrahim - given column inches in the print
media before BN suffered losses in the general election? And were opposition
figures treated justly, the little that they were covered?

Old Media has been hitting back at New Media and one accusation is that the
latter is somehow less professional compared to their colleagues working in
the traditional format. I don't think so.

Sharifuddin A Latiff representing Hartal MSM (a media monitor group in The
People's Parliament to which I belong as well) articulated our stand when he
wrote Malaysiakini, you're no longer 'alternative media'.
http://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/81235

Azmi is of the opinion that the Malaysiakini base audience expects it to
condemn everything about the BN. I agree with Azmi that Malaysiakini was to
some degree an enfant terrible but I disagree that this news outlet has not
evolved and matured.

Whatever my personal misgivings about BN, I support the trend of
Malaysiakini necessarily giving them air-time. I expect that the
Malaysiakini readership shares our Hartal MSM view:

'Just as the Pakatan Rakyat has now become a 'mainstream' political player,
so too has the equation changed for what was previously dubbed MSM'.

Sharifuddin, on behalf of Hartal MSM, wrote: 'We're living in a different
world now and our understanding of this changed environment in the terms we
choose to describe it must be adjusted accordingly'. Malaysiakini has indeed
re-calibrated and not limited itself to opposition turf.

Steven declared, 'We stand with the underdogs, no matter who they are'. The
Malaysian reading public will hold him to that, and his outfit to the same
standard of accountability and decorum demanded of the MSM.

pywong
27th October 2008, 04:00 PM
Malaysia's press freedom ranking on a free fall
http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/91779

RSF Ranking: From 92 to 124 to 132...
http://www.jeffooi.com/2008/10/rsf_ranking_from_92_to_124_to.php

The Star: Lie or genuine error on press freedom ranking?
http://anilnetto.com/democracy/the-star-lie-or-genuine-error-on-press-freedom-ranking/