Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Can we Trust UMNO - The economics of legal plunder - Sakmongkol AK47

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2008

    Can we Trust UMNO - The economics of legal plunder - Sakmongkol AK47

    Bernas, Malaysia's leading rice smuggler
    ARCHIVES 2008

    Wednesday, 23 January 2008

    In August 2003, I wrote about Bernas, the cash cow of Shahidan Kassim, the Menteri Besar of Perlis. There was no Malaysia Today then of course because Malaysia Today was only launched in August 2004 so no one took any notice of what I wrote at that time. Recently, Bernas made the headlines when the New Straits Times reported that the ACA had launched an investigation on the goings-on in the company. Maybe it is now time to revisit what I wrote five years or so ago and explore in what way the Prime Minister, Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, is involved in the conspiracy to scam the Malaysian public.


    Raja Petra Kamarudin

    ACA probes import of RM60m rice

    (New Straits Times, 5 January 2008.) - The Anti-Corruption Agency has started a probe against rice distributor Padiberas Nasional Bhd (Bernas) and the Agriculture and Agro-based Industry Ministry. Investigations centred around 25,000 tonnes of fragrant rice worth RM60 million imported from Thailand without an import permit. A team of ACA officers interviewed several ministry staff on Thursday.

    Yesterday, ACA officers went to the Bernas offices in Petaling Jaya where statements were recorded. ACA investigations director Mohd Shukri Abdull confirmed the investigations. “Checks at the two premises are being conducted as part of investigation. So far, only the statements of several officers at the ministry and Bernas have been recorded,” he said.

    Investigators are also probing whether the rules and regulations regarding imports had been followed. The ACA is also investigating whether there is any hanky-panky going on.Meanwhile, ministry secretary-general Datuk Dr Zulkifli Idris said Bernas officials met ministry officials and Customs officers yesterday. “Bernas apologised for importing rice above the permitted quota without referring to the ministry. It also given assurances that such a mistake will not be repeated,” he said.

    He added that Bernas claimed it was forced to place an early order for rice because of anxieties that it would be difficult to get supplies of rice as there was currently a shortage in the world market. “In a situation of first-come, first-served, Bernas placed an order for 16,000 tonnes of rice for last year and an additional 19,000 tonnes for this year although the overall quota for 2008 has yet to be decided,” Dr Zulkifli said.

    He added that an AP had been issued for the rice which exceeded the permitted quota. All parties also agreed on a more effective mechanism for the process of importing rice and to hold more frequent meetings. The ministry also agreed to issue APs immediately for importing rice within the permitted quota and additional APs within a week if the imports exceeded the quota.

    Last Monday, Bernas had imported fragrant rice without an AP resulting in 10,000 tonnes to be held at the Pasir Gudang port. An additional 10,000 tonnes could not be unloaded on a ship in the Kota Kinabalu port and 5,000 tonnes at Port Klang.

    Bernas is said to have submitted an AP application to the ministry on Dec 20, as soon as the ships carrying the rice docked at the ports. It is an offence to import fragrant rice without an AP as the rules state that the AP has to be issued prior to the rice being imported and not the other way around.

    MPs want Bernas to be reviewed

    (Bernama, 15 November 2005) -- Syarikat Beras Nasional (Bernas) which has the sole rice importing licence in the country has received much criticism from members of parliament who want its functions and structure to be reviewed. Datuk Badruddin Amiruldin (BN-Jerai) said the government must intervene in the matter as he claimed the company's functions had contradicted its original objectives.

    He told the Dewan Rakyat the move by the government in giving the import permit (AP) to Bernas had resulted in the company focusing on importing rice instead of producing rice for the country. “Importing (rice) is easy but processing it entails much problems. What has happened to the conditions imposed on Bernas? What we see now is that Bumiputera-owned rice mills have closed down...where are they now?” he asked when debating the Ministry of Agriculture and Ago-based Industry's Supply Bill 2006 at the committee stage Tuesday.

    Badruddin also questioned the national rice stockpile which was 92 metric tons at any one time which was previously located at Anak Bukit. He said it was an offence for the national rice stockpile for use during an emergency to be kept by a private company as it involved national security.

    Meanwhile, Datuk Bung Moktar Raden (BN-Kinabantangan) when debating on the same bill said the government must be firm on the country's direction in terms of agriculture, whether to continue to be an importing country or to realise the objective of strengthening the agricultural sector to become a producing country. “Why do we want to be both (importing and producing rice) which would eventually bring us nothing and people see that Bernas is making the profit,” he said.

    Bernas was making money by importing rice and selling it instead of buying from the farmers, he said. Also touching on the same issue during the debate were Datuk Raja Ahmad Zainuddin Raja Omar (BN-Larut), Mo'kiman Kobran (BN-Hulu Langat), Ir Shaari Hassan (BN-Tanah Merah), Dr Mohd Hayati Othman (PAS-Pendang) and Mohd Razali Che Mamat (BN-Kuala Krai).

    Pagar makan padi: The Bernas story

    (Free Anwar Campaign, 26 August 2003) - Padiberas Nasional Berhad, better known as Bernas, wants to retrench a couple of thousand of its staff because, according to the company, it is losing money. And the reason it is losing money, laments the company, is due to the rampant rice smuggling.

    Actually there is more than meets the eye and it is not as straightforward as they try to make it appear. In the latest issue of Seruan Keadilan out today, the official newspaper of the National Justice Party reveals what is really going on.

    Last year, Bernas made a pre-tax profit of RM60 million on a turnover of RM1.76 billion. No doubt the company could argue that this is a drop of 54% from the figure of RM128 million the year before that. Nevertheless, the ‘suffering’ Bernas still saw fit to pay its Directors RM4 million in salaries and its shareholders RM21 million in dividends. That’s RM25 million in all.

    If an austerity drive is necessary, should it not be the Directors and shareholders who suffer the cuts first rather than retrench more than 2,000 staff just because the company is not happy with the lower profit it made? And take note, it still did make a profit, though lower, and not make a loss as they claim.

    Bernas’ profits have been yo-yoing from one year to another. Three years ago it made a mere RM18 million while the year before that it made RM111 million. Its turnover too fluctuates between RM1.7 billion and RM1.9 billion a year, still an impressive enough figure and not one of a company about to go under. In fact, on average, it made RM80 million in profits a year over the last four years from 1999 to 2002.

    Bernas is far from floundering if this is the impression the company is trying to give. Bernas, which was given the rice import monopoly for Malaysia, is actually going great guns acquiring various companies in the food industry. The truth is, Bernas wants to reduce its dependence on the rice industry to 60% by diversifying into other food related businesses. Bernas, to quote what the company says, wants to become another Nestle.

    Bernas has set aside RM300 million for these acquisitions. It paid RM55 million to buy a 30% stake in Gardenia and RM14 million for Burger King. It also acquired an interest in Rasa Sayang Food Industries and is said to be making a back-door entry into Kentucky Fried Chicken for RM110 million. It has also entered into ‘strategic alliances’ with other food conglomerates like QAF Ltd of Singapore and Dewina, a company linked to the Deputy Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi’s family.

    Is Bernas’ ‘strategic alliance’ with Dewina a business move or is it ‘investing’ in the next Prime Minister of Malaysia?

    But is this what Bernas was set up for? Certainly not! Bernas is supposed to ensure that Malaysia’s dependence on rice imports is reduced to 35% or less. This is to ensure that, in the event of a war or a major catastrophe in any of the rice exporting countries like Thailand, Vietnam, China, etc., Malaysia will not be starved of rice -- reminiscent of WWII when Malayans then had to eat Tapioca.

    Malaysia is the only rice producing country in South-East Asia that is highly dependent on rice imports. Malaysia is at a great security risk and all our neighbours have to do is to stop selling us rice and we will be brought to our knees. And Bernas’ role is to reduce this dependence.

    But this is not happening. Instead, Bernas wants to transform itself into another Nestle rather than safeguard the needs of Malaysia’s rice consumers and padi farmers. If we want another Nestle there are many other trading giants that can play that role. Why must Bernas dabble in affairs it was not set up to be involve in?

    By the way, out of curiosity, who are these people who are enjoying this RM25 million per year in Directors’ fees and dividends? The Perlis Menteri Besar, Shahidan Kassim, and his immediate family, are these beneficiaries. Incidentally, they are attempting to sell off their stake in the company and may be hundreds of millions of Ringgit richer soon.

    Bernas says that rice smuggling is crippling it. If making RM80 million per year is being crippled, then I don’t mind being crippled any time. Better being crippled with RM80 million in my pocket every year than walking upright but being broke to boot.

    But who are these smugglers that Bernas is complaining about? According to the rice millers association that has about 300 members, it is the rice importers who are doing all the smuggling. And isn’t the sole importer of rice Bernas itself. Hmm…maybe Bernas is right about the rice smuggling. The question is, who is the one doing the smuggling? It appears like Bernas is this rice smuggler so why are they complaining?

    The Deputy Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi says he wants to arrest the rice smugglers under the Internal Security Act. Do I take it there will be a vacancy for the position of Perlis Menteri Besar soon?

    The TV stations once showed clips of so-called rice smugglers walking across the Malaysian-Thai border. According to a retired Police Inspector, Mansor, these people are merely couriers. They are paid a certain amount for every sack of rice they carry across the border.

    “I used to be the Inspector of Rantau Panjang,” said Mansor. “We didn’t bother about these people walking across the border. These people are not smugglers. They are just couriers earning a living. If we stop them from earning a living this way, then they may resort to other means to make a living, like crime.”

    True enough, these ‘smugglers’ walk across the border with sacks of rice on their heads right under the very noses of the police, immigration and customs officers. And, to the authorities, they are not committing any crime.

    “Sometimes we need to take action just to show we are doing our job,” said Mansor. “So we tip off the bosses that we will be making a raid that night. We then agree that they will abandon one or two lorries for us to confiscate.”

    “The driver will of course ‘escape’,” said Mansor laughing.

    “Once we arrested some of those couriers and guess who came to bail them out?” asked Mansor. “Hussein Ahmad!”

    Hussein Ahmad is the kingpin of Umno Rantau Panjang, one-time Minister in Malaysian Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s government who achieved ‘fame’ when he fired his pistol during an Umno division meeting. He was understandably never arrested nor was his pistol confiscated.

    “Zaman Khan’s family is also involved in this business,” revealed Mansor. “His family in fact comes from Golok and they have many businesses there such as hotels and so on.”

    “How then to take action when the top guns themselves are involved?” laments Mansor. “If I clamp down I might find myself transferred out of Rantau Panjang super-fast. So we just close our eyes and, once in awhile, stage these ‘successful’ raids and confiscate a few sacks or rice just to keep everyone quiet.”

    “But these couriers are small-time. They just carry one sack across the border. And how many sacks can they carry in a day? It’s the legal importers who are the big-time smugglers. They bring rice in by the containers. And they can do so because they have import permits.”

    And the question is, how much rice do they bring in? According to some sources, the ‘imports’ far exceed what their permits allow. This is how the smuggling is done. And, again I ask, who are these permit holders? No prize for the right guess.

    The Malays have a proverb for this, ‘harapkan pagar, pagar makan padi’, which means ‘you depend on the fence, but the fence eats the rice’ or those entrusted to look after the rice are actually those eating the rice.

    How the Shahidan clan acquired the Bernas cash cow

    (Free Anwar Campaign, 27 August 2003) - Lembaga Padi Negara or LPN was privatised about eight years ago into what is known today as Padiberas Nasional Berhad (Bernas). Though it is supposed to be a public company, Bernas is very much controlled by one family, that of the Menteri Besar of Perlis, Shahidan Kassim.

    How did Shahidan get his hands on Malaysia’s rice monopoly that brings in a turnover of almost RM2 billion per annum and profits averaging about RM80 million per year? The story of Bernas is not a rags-to-riches story but one of richer-to-even-richer.

    Shahidan was then the Member of Parliament for Arau, Perlis, the Chairman of Parliament’s Back Benchers Club (BBC), Chairman of FAMA, Chairman of Yayasan MARA, Director of MARA, and many more. The then Menteri Besar of Perlis was Dr Hamid Pawanteh who was slotted for ‘retirement’ due some ‘indiscretions’ that was threatening to blow up if he continued as Menteri Besar. Shahidan was identified as Dr Hamid’s successor.

    Malaysian Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad summoned Shahidan and told him that he and Dr Hamid would have to switch jobs. Dr Hamid would be contesting the 1995 General Election on a Parliament seat while Shahidan would in turn take over his state seat. The reason being, Shahidan would have to take over as the next Menteri Besar of Perlis.

    However, much to Dr Mahathir’s surprise, Shahidan declined the Prime Minister’s ‘offer’. He told the Prime Minister he was not interested in the Perlis Menteri Besar’s job. He was more interested in getting rich and would rather do business.

    And this was what Shahidan discussed with the Prime Minister as revealed by one of his business partners whose company Shahidan was the Chairman of.

    “Why should I want to be the Menteri Besar of Perlis?” asked Shahidan Kassim when I met him just before the 1995 General Elections. “What has Perlis got?”

    “At least if I am Menteri Besar of Kedah that is something. Kedah is big. There are a lot of business opportunities there. Perlis is so small, it has nothing!”

    “And that is what I told the PM,” said Shahidan. “I told him I am not interested in being the Perlis MB. I want to do business.”

    “The PM was taken aback,” added Shahidan. “He asked me what business I wanted to do and I told him I wanted to take over the privatisation of Bernas.”

    “The PM was puzzled. He told me he has offered me the Perlis MB’s post and I reject the offer. Other people would jump at the chance.”

    “I told him I am more interested in getting rich,” laughed Shahidan.

    “The PM said he will think about it and get back to me later. A few days later the PM told me that he will agree to me taking over Bernas if I agree to become the MB.”

    “I asked the PM, how is this possible? The PM replied to leave that to him. He will clear it with the Cabinet. He will explain to the Cabinet that the Bernas deal is part of the terms for me accepting the MB’s post.”

    And that was how Shahidan ended up with control of the privatised Bernas.

    FAC News spoke to one senior officer of LPN to get his side of the story on the wheeling and dealing of that one-time national rice board. This officer, on being told that LPN would be privatised, decided to throw in the towel and seek early retirement.

    “Once I saw what they were going to do, I decided to quit,” explained the officer.

    “I saw the move to privatise LPN as just one more move to make some people rich and I wanted nothing to do with it.”

    “I spent practically my entire working life serving LPN. Our only mission in life was to serve the rice farmers and ensure that their welfare was well taken care of. But what they wanted to do to LPN is criminal. So I just left in disgust.”

    “It’s not only what they wanted to do that was so wrong. It is also the people who were behind the whole exercise that was not right.”

    “I personally know Shahidan so I know what type of person he is. He is just out to make money. And he was going to do so at the welfare of the rice farmers.”

    “There are 160,000 rice farmers in Malaysia,” argued the retired LPN officer. “And most of them live in poverty.”

    “For example, for the year 2000, an estimated 9% or almost 16,000 rice farmers have incomes below the poverty level.”

    “The estimated annual average net income from rice cultivation in Peninsula Malaysia for that same year ranged from RM1,500, or RM125 per month, in areas like Telok Intan, Kelantan and Terengganu, to RM6,000, or RM500 per month, in advanced areas like MADA.”

    “How does one support a family with that low income level?” asked the retired officer.

    “It is time the truth is revealed and Malaysians are made aware of the exploitation the rice farmers are being subjected to.”

    Despite government expenditures for infrastructure development and financial assistance through input subsidisation and price support policies, a high level of poverty still exists amongst rice farmers. The situation did not improve much since the eight years after the privatisation of LPN into Bernas. Under Bernas, the individual shareholders of the privatised entity are now making profits at the expense of several hundred thousands rice farmers, their families, and other public stakeholders.

    For example, for the year 2001, Bernas made a RM128 million profit before tax. For the year 2000, it made RM83 million and, in 1999, RM117 million. In 2002, it made about RM60 million.

    But who really benefits from this profit? The rice farmers? Of course not! Those who benefit from these hundreds of millions of Ringgit every year are the major shareholders of Bernas.

    And who are these shareholders?

    One of them is Budaya Generasi Sdn Bhd (BGSB), which owns 34% of Bernas. The single largest shareholder of BGSB is Permatang Jaya Sdn Bhd (PJSB), which has a 44% interest in BGSB or, effectively, 15% of Bernas.

    And who are the shareholders of BGSB?

    The shareholders of BGSB are Dohat Bin Shafie and his daughter Nur Daliza Binti Dohat. Dohat Bin Shafie is the brother-in-law of none other than Shahidan!

    The point is, the Shahidan family of Perlis owns 15% of the privatised national rice entity which is of strategic importance to the country and which the government acknowledged in its National Agriculture Policy 3 (NAP3) to be the backbone of the food security policy of the country!

    Then, Sebiro Holdings Sdn Bhd, another shareholder, owns 5.5% of BGSB. A prominent Director of the company is Megat Junid Bin Megat Ayob, the Prime Minister’s henchman.

    The other four (public) shareholders of BGSB representing the interests of several hundred thousand rice farmers, farmers and fishermen, own the other 34% of BGSB or only 11% of Bernas. These four are:

    · Pertubuhan Peladang Kebangsaan (NAFAS)

    · Persatuan Nelayan Kebangsaan (NEKMAT)

    · Syarikat Perniagaan Peladang (MADA) Sdn. Bhd.

    · Syarikat Perniagaan Peladang (KADA) Sdn. Bhd.
    Just for the record, Yayasan Pok Rafeah Berdaftar, is the 11th largest shareholder of Bernas. Yayasan Pok Rafeah funds the Pok Rafeah Chair at Institut Kefahaman Malaysia dan Antarabangsa (IKMAS) at UKM. And Pok Rafeah is the mother to Tun Daim Zainuddin, another Umno kingpin and one-time Finance Minister of Malaysia.

    Despite being a registered foundation, interestingly enough, the Registrar of Societies apparently did not have any information on Yayasan Pok Rafeah as to its Board of Trustees or any other information.

    Last year, Bernas paid its Directors RM4 million in salaries. And, to add insult to injury, it declared a 10% dividend to its shareholders amounting to RM21 million! Just figure out how much the individual shareholders of Bernas are getting out of this?

    Presumably, all this was the ‘reward’ for a ‘brilliant performance’ of turning in a RM128 million pre-tax profits for 2001 on revenues of some RM1.6 billion -- roughly 7.5% on sales. But then Bernas is about to retrench more than 2,000 employees on the excuse it is losing money.

    Bernas is Malaysia’s sole licensed rice importer until 2010. In short, it has a monopoly on Malaysia’s rice import business and it is continuing to extend its grip on the rice market. Bernas derives most of its profits from cornering the rice industry so it is not that difficult to make money. Why, therefore, the need to generously reward its Directors?

    Another very important point to consider is: the government has acknowledged the importance of rice in the food security policy of the country. This is especially so after the 1997-98 currency crisis and the ever-increasing import bills for rice and other food products. Under the NAP3, the Self-Sufficiency Level (SSL) for rice is set at 65% until 2010.

    Malaysia, therefore, is still very far from self-sufficiency and needs to import the balance 35% of its needs while other countries surrounding Malaysia not only DO NOT import their rice, but exports it -- to Malaysia. Even China, which needs to feed 20% of the world’s population, can export rice.

    Why does Malaysia still depend on a high level of rice imports to feed the nation? And why does the government allow this? The answer is simple! This is so that Bernas can have the monopoly for all rice imports into Malaysia until the year 2010 and make tons of money out of it.

    However, one has to remember that a 35% reliance on the open global rice market is risky given that rice is thinly traded. Only 5% of the world’s rice supply is traded in the open market compared to, for example, 12% for wheat. And, in the event of a bad harvest in one or two of the major exporting countries such as Thailand, Cambodia or Vietnam, or bad harvests in a number of major consuming countries such as India, China or Indonesia, or worse, bad harvests for both exporting and consuming countries as was the case during the el Nino catastrophe -- thus forcing the exporting nations to supply only their domestic needs, and forcing the major consuming nations to buy rice in the open market -- there will not be any rice left in the open market for Malaysia.

    The reality is, the cash cow for the whole rice industry in Malaysia is the rice import license and this has been solely awarded to Bernas. Thus, it is high time for Bernas to fulfil its obligations to its other stakeholders and not just focus on enriching its few privileged shareholders.

    But Bernas is ‘buying protection’ in case pressure is put upon it by the incoming administration of Deputy Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi. It has just formed strategic alliances with the incoming powers-that-be to ensure that the new administration that will take over after Mahathir retires in October 2003 will continue to look upon Bernas favourably.

    And, to achieve this, Bernas has just agreed to distribute and market Dewina Trading Sdn Bhd's products locally and internationally.

    Dewina Trading is the sales and marketing arm of convenience food manufacturer Dewina Bhd. Now, who owns Dewina? Isn’t this company associated with Deputy Prime Minister Abdullah Ahamd Badawi’s family? Malaysia-today....

  2. #2

    Re: BERNAS: A body to protect our rice security?

    Why not umno also corporatise PDRM and MINDEF.In that way foreign power have no need to wage war to colonise us.Simply buy up controlling equity.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2008

    Food Security: Rice - Why is Bernas in the hands of one man?

    Food security is a key element in any international trade negotiation. All nations protect their food producers. In Malaysia, we set up the National Padi Board to protect our rice farmers' income by giving them subsidies and price protection. This board morphed into a company listed in the KLSE - BERNAS. At one stage, BERNAS was making more than a hundred million a year. Makes one wonder how a monopoly designed to protect rice farmers can make so much money. More below....

    Opposition questions sale of Bernas to Syed Mokhtar


    Tuesday, 24 November 2009 Super Admin

    Written by Chan Kok Leong, The Edge

    Opposition members of Parliament have questioned the rationale behind letting one man control the nation’s rice imports. According to Saifuddin Nasution (Machang-PKR), Bernas will be controlled by one person — Tan Sri Syed Mokhtar Al-Bukhary — if more shares are sold to the business magnate. Malaysiatoday....

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2008

    Tradewinds proposes to acquire Bernas for almost RM526m

    Interesting how BERNAS has become a corporate football to be bought and sold. How is it a rice monopoly set up to protect the rice farmers and rice supply, has become a listed company whose primary objective would be profits.

    Tradewinds proposes to acquire Bernas for almost RM526m

    KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 28 — Tradewinds (M) Bhd has proposed to acquire 53.76 percent stake in Padiberas Nasional Bhd (Bernas) for RM525.992 million.

    In a statement, Tradewinds said it has signed conditional share sales agreement to acquire 31.52 per cent equity interest in Bernas from Wang Tak Co Ltd at RM2.08 apiece, or RM308.425 million cash. TheMalaysiaInsider....

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2008

    BERNAS: Tradewinds executes novation agreement

    Need to monitor this to see where it leads.

    Tradewinds executes novation agreement

    KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 31 — Tradewinds (M) Bhd (TWM) says it had executed a novation agreement with the Government of Malaysia and Budaya Generasi (M) Sdn Bhd (BGSB) yesterday.

    This is to novate to TWM the privatisation agreement dated Jan 18, 1996 between the Government and BGSB relating to the obligations of Padiberas Nasional Bhd (Bernas), it said in a filing to Bursa Malaysia.

    TVM had announced the acquisition of a 31.52 per cent stake in Bernas from Wang Tak Company Ltd and another 22.24 per cent from Gandingan Bersepadu Sdn Bhd (GBSB) pursuant to a dividend-in-specie exercise on Bernas shares by its subsidiary BGSB which is a substantial shareholder of Bernas.

    It had also called for a mandatory general offer for all Bernas shares not already owned by TWM.

    Following the effectiveness of the novation agreement, the statement said BGSB agreed to assign, novate, transfer to and vest in favour of TWM all the rights, liabilities, benefits, interests, duties and obligations of BGSB under the privatisation agreement.

    BGSB would also proceed to undertake the dividend-in-specie exercise.

    Meanwhile, the privatisation agreement entered earlier between the Government and BGSB, had stated that the privatisation company would take over all the rights and liabilities of Bernas as a shareholder of Bernas upon the terms and conditions of the privatisation agreement and in the agreement between Bernas and the Government dated Jan 12, 1996.

    Also subject to the provisions of the Control of Padi and Rice Act 1994, the privatisation company would ensure that Bernas shall conserve, maintain and manage the national padi/rice stockpile and purchase padi from padi farmers at the guaranteed minimum price as determined by the Government from time to time.

    It would also act as a buyer of last resort for the padi farmers, undertake to manage the disbursement of subsidies to padi farmers and manage the Bumiputra Rice Millers Schemes.

    Following these undertakings, the Government had agreed that Bernas shall be granted the right to import rice into Malaysia for a duration of 15 years from the date of the Bernas Agreement.

    And based on the quarterly financial statements of Bernas for the financial quarter ended Sept 30, 2007, this right has been extended to Jan 11, 2016.

    The privatisation company shall ensure a fair and stable price of rice for the consumers, sufficient supply of rice in Malaysia to meet the requirements of the nation and to maintain the quality and standard of rice. — Bernama TheMalaysiaInsider....

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2008

    Can we Trust UMNO - The economics of legal plunder - Sakmongkol AK47

    SATURDAY, OCTOBER 31, 2009

    Robert Kuok's departure from sugar business: A sign of the times?

    This transaction may have more stories that will never be told than what is told. Is it a sign of the times?

    Why would a solidly run company dispose off a key contributor to the Malaysian arm of its food commodities business? Why sell off it's market dominance in Malaysia? That is so very unlike Robert Kuok.

    Kuok isn't called "The Sugar King" for nothing. Well, he's still got his sugar interests outside of Malaysia.

    This is a nuanced post because the transaction is nuanced.

    PPB Group Bhd, controlled by tycoon Tan Sri Robert Kuok, stands to lose its dominance of the domestic sugar market under a proposal to sell its entire stake in two sugar units and land used for sugar cane cultivation to Federal Land Development Authority (Felda) for RM1.29 billion.

    The proposed sale will see PPB exiting the local sugar industry, which had earned founder Kuok his nickname of "Sugar King".

    PPB said it will dispose of its entire 36.36 million shares of RM1 each in Malayan Sugar Manufacturing Co Bhd (MSM) to Felda Global Ventures Holdings Sdn Bhd, a wholly-owned unit of Felda.

    It is also selling its 50 per cent stake, or six million shares of RM1 each, in Kilang Gula Felda Perlis Sdn Bhd to Felda Global Ventures for RM26.31 million.

    Felda Holdings Bhd already holds a 50 per cent stake in the company, which is involved in sugar cane milling and refining of domestic and imported raw sugar.

    The group said the disposal of these three assets will help it realise its investments with a substantial gain.

    Meanwhile, its 49 per cent-owned associate Grenfell Holdings Sdn Bhd will sell its stake in plantation group and sugar refiner Tradewinds (M) Bhd for RM207.53 million.

    Tradewinds is controlled by businessman Tan Sri Syed Mokhtar Al-Bukhary.

    According to PPB's 2008 annual report, MSM and Kilang Gula Felda Perlis produced more than 750,000 tonnes of refined sugar, supplying some 60 per cent of the domestic sugar requirements last year.

    Its sugar refining and cane plantation business contributed 27 per cent to the group's revenue of RM3.46 billion and 36.5 per cent to its operating profit of RM431.2 million in the fiscal year ended December 31 2008.

    This makes the business its second largest contributor, after its grains and feed business.


    Najib's advice: Change your lifestyle.

    Sugar Price Increase

    Domestic sugar price went up by 40% from Jan 2010 to May 2011 ever since the sugar monopoly was taken over by FELDA from Robert Kuok. Yet at the old price, Robert Kuok could make good profit.

    Global Sugar price stable from Oct 2009 to Apr 2011.

    Between Dec 09 till now, the global price was virtually unchanged yet the domestic price of sugar has gone up by 40% ever since Robert Kuok sold the sugar business to FELDA in Oct 2009!
    KUALA LUMPUR, May 9, 2011 — The price of sugar will be raised by 20 sen to RM2.30 effective at midnight.
    This follows a previous increase in December last year, which saw the price being raised by a similar amount.

    The increase is part of the government’s concerted subsidy cuts first announced on July 16 last year, when prices went up by five sen per litre for petrol and diesel, 10 sen per kg for LPG and 20 sen per kg for sugar.

    It also comes after the price of RON97 petrol was increased by 20 sen last week. RON97 is, however, not subsidised and its price determined by a managed float.

    Last week, the United Nations released a survey projecting a moderate slide in economic growth for Malaysia this year due to rising food and fuel prices, which economists predicted would be further hampered by the government’s lack of political will for reforms.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Friday, 13 May 2011 07:54
    'Secret' deal between 'Sugar King' and Felda?

    Written by Malaysia Chronicle

    Did Malaysia's sugar king sell his company to a Felda subsidiary?

    This is the question posed by Indera Mahkota member of parliament earlier this week in parliament, urging the government to come clean on claims that Robert Kuok’s Malaysia Sugar Manufacturing Co Sdn Bhd (MSM) had been 'secretly' sold to Felda Global Ventures Holdings Sdn Bhd (FGVH).

    “Felda is an important government linked company. Why was the total purchase not announced openly? Which agency has done the asset valuation and liability assessment on the company?” questioned Azan Ismail.

    Azan alleged that the government had deliberately hidden the deal from public until a series of price hikes which also affected sugar to be raised by 20 sen.

    According to reports, FGVH had also purchased Kilang Gula Felda Perlis Sdn Bhd, a land of some 5,800 hectares in Chuping, Perlis and a 20 percent stake in Tradewinds (M) Bhd, totalling some RM1.5 billion.

    It was also understood that Kuok, Malaysia's richest man, had gone ahead to purchase CSR Limited, the largest sugar exporter in Australia.

    “Currently, if Felda wants to import sugar from Australia, the agency will need to buy from the company owned by Kuok. This is meaningless to Felda because in the end, if there’s a hike in sugar price in the country, Felda will be blamed.

    "At the same time, profit has been made by the same people, who are Barisan Nasional’s cronies and reaped benefits from decades of sugar monopoly in the country,” Azan was quoted as saying by Suara Keadilan's online edition.

    Azan said the profits from such a hike would definitely be used to fund Barisan Nasional’s general election campaign.

    Azan said the government now appeared to appease Malays by alleging that the purchase of the sugar company by Felda was for their own benefit.

    “The Malays should not be taken in by this action. The purchase of Kuok’s sugar factory by Felda will not ensure the fate of the Malays will be cared for. We don't know who are the interested parties in this transaction and who made the profit," he said, adding that documents related to the deal be revealed.

    - Harakahdaily

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Guan Eng calls for Felda to bear sugar subsidy cuts

    By Lee Wei Lian
    May 23, 2011

    KUALA LUMPUR, May 23 — Lim Guan Eng continued to pressure the government over subsidy cutbacks, saying that the government should look at the profitability of some of its government-owned businesses first before burdening the public with further price increases.

    The DAP secretary-general said in a media statement today that the purported RM116.6 million in savings from raising sugar prices by 20 sen could be more than offset by the RM232 million in profit reported by MSM Malaysia Holdings Bhd, a subsidiary of government-owned Felda Global Ventures Holdings Sdn Bhd.

    “What is RM116.6 million compared to RM232 million in profits earned by MSM last year?” asked Lim (picture). “Instead of doing its corporate social responsibility to help Malaysians, especially the poor, Felda would benefit from the RM116.6 million extra to be paid by Malaysians.”

    Lim said the BN-led government could easily transfer the RM116.6 million cost of the subsidy cutback to MSM since it is owned by Felda.

    “Instead, in line with BN’s misguided and corporate-centric policy of helping the rich companies at the expense of poor ordinary Malaysians, BN has chosen to hit the pockets of 27 million Malaysians first than the already huge profits of corporate giants such as Felda or MSM,” he said.

    MSM, however, will be listed later this year and is expected to be the largest IPO so far in 2011 and could raise as much as RM900 million, according to media reports.

    MSM, which was previously known as Malayan Sugar Manufacturing Co Bhd, recorded a 32 per cent jump in sales to RM2.17 billion in 2010 from 2009, according to its draft prospectus.

    Profit, meanwhile, fell slightly to RM232.9 million from RM237.3 million during the same period.

    Lim noted that Felda is a statutory body founded in 1956 to alleviate poverty among rural Malays via a land resettlement scheme.

    He also repeated his call that for action to be taken to reduce gas subsidies, estimated to be worth RM19 billion annually, to independent power producers (IPPs) rather than reducing diesel and gas subsidies “worth a few hundred million ringgit that hurts ordinary Malaysians.”

    The government hiked the price of sugar on May 10 by 20 sen as part of its subsidy rationalisation programme.

    Dosmetic Trade, Co-operatives and Consumerism Ministry secretary-general Datuk Mohd Zain Mohd Dom on Monday said that the price increase would save the government RM116.6 million but would not eliminate subsidies completely as it would still be footing a subsidy bill of RM283.4 million.

    The government has also been raising fuel prices gradually by about 5 sen in July and December 2010, but significantly below the rate at which global fuel prices have been rising.

    It also abolished diesel subsidies for nine categories of commercial vehicles effective June 1.

    Lim said the BN government should withhold any further subsidy cuts until IPP gas subsidies themselves were rationalised.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2008

    Can we Trust UMNO - The economics of legal plunder - Sakmongkol AK47

    Wednesday, 01 February 2012 08:30

    Pua calls govt's bluff over 'skyrocketing' sugar price

    The claim that the government's subsidy for sugar increased has been questioned by a member of parliament who said global sugar price was tumbling.

    In response to Domestic Trade, Cooperatives and Consumerism minister Ismail Sabri Yaakob’s claim that sugar subsidies were increased due to skyrocketing global sugar price, Petaling Jaya Utara MP Tony Pua pointed out that world sugar price had significantly dropped.

    Sugar price was increased by 20 sen in May 2011 to RM2.30 per kilogramme. Since January 2010 when its price stood at RM1.45/kg, there has been a 58.6 percent increase within just 18 months as part of the government’s subsidy removal exercise.

    "What is extremely intriguing, however, was that global sugar prices over the past 6 months since the last price hike in May 2011 had in fact declined significantly, and not the purported ‘skyrocket’,” said Pua in a statement made available to Harakahdaily.

    Ismail earlier claimed that the government had to pump in extra 34 sen per kilogramme in subsidies for sugar to maintain the price at RM2.30 per kg due to pricier sugar price.
    “World prices have increased but we have decided not to raise the price here. We are doing what we can to reduce the people's burden,” said Ismail.

    Furnishing details, Pua said sugar price dropped 20.5 percent after hitting a peak of US$29.47 per hundred pounds in July 2011.

    Taking into account the 7 percent depreciation of the ringgit against the dollar over the past six month, Pua said the global sugar price would still have declined by 13.5 percent based on ringgit terms.

    Based on the calculation, Pua said the government's subsidy would also drop.
    “What is more perplexing is the fact that our subsidy had to increase by 170 percent to cope with the non-existent 'skyrocketing' global price of sugar,” he chided.

    According to Pua, 99 percent of Malaysia’s raw sugar requirements were imported and the local market was monopolised by only two refineries, the Malayan Sugar Manufacturing Holdings (MSM Holdings) and Tradewinds Corporation Bhd, which also acts as importers.
    These companies, revealed Pua, were linked to Felda with MSM Holdings a 71 percent subsidiary of FELDA-related entities while Tradewinds being controlled 43 percent by tycoon Syed Mokhtar al-Bukhary, with another 20 percent owned by FELDA Global Ventures Holdings Sdn Bhd.

    “The question then is - whether the 170 percent increase in sugar subsidy or approximately RM198 million a year payable to MSM Holdings and Tradewinds, is in fact a thinly disguised attempt to fatten the profits of these two politically-connected companies,” he said.


  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2008

    Can we Trust UMNO - The economics of legal plunder - Sakmongkol AK47

    RM34.5b debts: Another crisis in the making?

    Teoh El Sen
    | June 20, 2012
    DAP MP Tony Pua wants to know if the government would have to bail out Syed Mokhtar Al-Bukhary's companies, which have incurred massive debts.

    KUALA LUMPUR: Will there be a repeat of the 1998 financial crisis due to the massive corporate debts of tycoon Syed Mokhtar Al-Bukhary amounting to RM34.5 billion?

    Asking this today, Petaling Jaya Utara MP Tony Pua cited the 1998 Asian financial crisis which precipitated the collapse of “Umno crony company, Renong Bhd”, which, at the time, had debts in excess of RM20 billion (about 7% of all loans in the banking system then.)

    He said that Renong had gone bankrupt and caused hundreds of millions in losses to investors, leading to the collapse of the stock market index and triggered a RM10 billion bailout of the company by the government.

    Pua said Renong was one of the largest and favoured conglomerates by the BN government with interests in highways (PLUS, UEM, Linkedua), rail (KTM, Putra LRT), property, telecommunications (TIME) and a whole host of other companies.
    “Fast forward 14 years later, we now have Syed Mokhtar’s group of companies which have a combined debt of RM34.3 billion or more than 10% of all local currency outstanding corporate bonds as at 2011.

    “These companies have a total cash and cash equivalents of RM7.8 billion as at May 2012,” said the DAP publicity chief.
    Pua urged the government to explain what measures have been taken with Syed Mokhtar’s companies to avoid a situation similar to Renong.

    “The finance ministry must make available data on how much our financial institutions and statutory bodies such as the Employees Provident Fund (EPF), Civil Service Retirement Fund (KWAP), Tabung Haji Fund and Armed Forces Fund (LTAT) have invested in these debts,” Pua said, adding that all the above have provided loans to Syed Mokhtar’s companies.

    “We call upon the government to assure Malaysian taxpayers that in the event of a default, public monies will not be made to pay for the follies of Barisan Nasional cronies.”

    Monster bailouts

    Detailing the debts of Syed Moktar’s companies, Pua said they far exceeded that of Renong’s and expressed his fear that there would be a repeat of the Renong crisis requiring “monster bailouts with taxpayers’ funds”.

    “This fear is especially real in the light of a global economic slowdown and a fallout from the eurozone financial crisis,” he said.

    Pua said that Syed Mokhtar’s empire is generally held under four listed entities.

    “The largest of them is the 51.8%-owned MMC Corporation Bhd whose group alone has outstanding debt of RM24.2 billion. The key subsidiaries of MMC Corporation are Malakoff Corporation, Gas Malaysia, Aliran Ihsan Resources, Port of Tanjong Pelepas, Johor Port, Senai Airport Terminal Services, SMART Tunnel and the MMC-Gamuda joint ventures.”

    “His second largest entity is the 55.9%-owned DRB-Hicom Bhd which has debt of RM5.7 billion, including the most recent RM3.0 billion debt raised to acquire Proton Bhd.”

    Pua said other companies of the group are Edaran Otomobil Nasional, Modenas, Honda Malaysia, Bank Muamalat, Puspakom, Alam Flora, POS Malaysia, Defence Technologies and several property development companies.

    “The third entity is 43.0%-owned Tradewinds (M) Bhd which has debt of RM3.48 billion. It owns Bernas which has a monopoly on rice purchase, import and distribution in Malaysia; Central Sugar Refinery and smaller stakes in Malaysian Sugar Manufacturing Bhd, which together monopolises the Malaysian sugar market; and Tradewinds Plantations.”

    Pua said the fourth and final entity is the 71.5%-owned Tradewinds Corporation which has a debt of RM890 million. It runs several major hotel chains in Malaysia, including Crowne Plaza, Mutiara Kuala Lumpur, Hilton Kuching and Petaling Jaya and Hotel Istana.

    “Despite the expansiveness of his empire, and the load of his debt holdings, the Prime Minister’s Department has just confirmed the privatisation of Penang Port to him. With no details yet available, the acquisition will certainly require him to raise possibly several billions of additional debt to fund the exercise.

    “What’s more, it has been widely rumoured that Syed Moktar is also leading the race to acquire Port Klang [Northport Holdings] as well as KTM Bhd.”

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Visitors found this page by searching for:

trust umno

umno took over sugar business

mmc saga syed mokhtar

modenas owned by syed mokhtar

pas dan umno

bernas monopolised rice market

SEO Blog

Tags for this Thread


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts