Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Harapkan Pagar, Pagar Makan Padi: Padi seed supplier unqualified

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2008

    Harapkan Pagar, Pagar Makan Padi: Padi seed supplier unqualified

    Padi seeds supplier: Criteria not met, but...

    • Kuek Ser Kuang Keng

    • 7:55AM Oct 10, 2012

    One of the country's largest padi seed suppliers that bagged a government contract has conceded his company did not meet thetender criteria, but pointed out that others are in the same boat.

    "This is not an issue," said Mansor Md Nor, the manager of Haji Md Nor bin Haji Abd Rahmah (M) Sdn Bhd (HMN), brushing off the allegation.

    Asked to respond to a claim that his company was in breach of a tender criterion that requires bidders to own plants, he admitted one of the two plants operated by HMN was leased from Muda Agriculture Development Authority, a federal agency.

    "The plant (in Sungai Burong, Selangor) was in poor condition. After we took over, we renovated, fixed and repaired it to meet all the criteria set by the authorities," he said.

    HMN had received a quota for the annual supply of 20,000 tonnes of padi seeds from the Agriculture and Agro-based Industry Ministry to farmers from 2013 to 2014.

    This was the second-highest quantum among all 10 bumiputera suppliers, as posted on the ministry website.

    HMN and Kilang Beras Seri Merbok Sdn Bhd, which topped the list with a quota of 22,000 tonnes, together obtained 52.5 percent of the total annual padi supply quota of 80,000 tonnes.

    A spokesperson for Seri Merbok refused to comment when contacted, preferring to leave the issue to the Agriculture Ministry.

    Last week PAS vice-president Mahfuz Omar had revealed aleaked letter in Parliament, purportedly sent by the Finance Ministry to the Agriculture Ministry.

    The letter states that RM164.8 million allocated for the supply of padi seeds under an Agriculture Ministry programme had allegedly been awarded to suppliers who failed to meet the tender criteria.

    'The people have not complained'

    Stressing that HMN, established in 1992, is a pioneer in the industry, Mansor said Mahfuz failed to gather comprehensive information on the matter.

    "Those who have complained are politicians, the people themselves have not complained. This is a political issue because if the people (don't want to), they don't have to buy the seeds from me. We have proven that we have the capacity to process the padi seeds," he said.

    The issue had been widely circulated on the Internet since last month, following an anonymous article purportedly written by 'Anxious Member of MoA [Agriculture Ministry]', alleging that both HMN and Seri Merbok are cronies of Agriculture and Agro-based Industry Minister Noh Omar.

    Mansor has denied this. He insisted that the company has complied with other criteria set by the agriculture authorities.

    Tomorrow: Did Agri Ministry mislead finance counterpart?

    Yesterday: 'Unqualified' seeds suppliers win RM165mil tender


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2008

    'Unqualified' seeds suppliers win RM165mil tender

    • Kuek Ser Kuang Keng

    • 9:03AM Oct 9, 2012

    A RM164.8 million tender to supply padi seeds to farmers under a programme run by the Agriculture and Agro-based Industries Ministry, has been awarded to a number of suppliers who failed to meet the tender criteria, according to a letter leaked from the Finance Ministry.

    In addition, it said that qualified bumiputera suppliers were rejected for reasons that were not stated in the tender criteria.

    However, one of the suppliers said to have failed the tender criteria, and who is described to be crony of Agriculture and Agro-based Industries Minister Noh Omar, has defended the tender result, while another supplier contacted by Malaysiakini refused to comment on the controversy.

    The purportedlyleaked letter, dated July 20, 2012, was released by PAS vice-president Mahfuz Omar in Parliament last Wednesday and copies of it were distributed to the media.

    The letter is signed by the government procurement division of the Finance Ministry and addressed to Agriculture Ministry secretary-general Mohd Hashim Abdullah.

    "MOF (Finance Ministry) has studied the certificate of the above tender and found that the technical evaluation process and tender certificate did not comply with the criteria set in the tender documents, and were not in line with tender principles," the letter states.

    The letter lists three breaches:

    • Tenderers who did not submit complete tender documents were accepted for evaluation;

    • Tenderers who failed to comply with the tender, such as failure to submit bumiputera certificates, attend tender briefings and meet basic tender criteria (did not have indented cylinder and own a factory), and failed the financial evaluation, were accepted for the consideration of the procurement board; and

    • Tenderers who passed the basic technical evaluation criteria were not recommended by the technical evaluation committee because they have no experience in producing paddy seeds under Agriculture Ministry. However, a review by the Finance Ministry found that the experience of the tenderers were not included as evaluation criteria in the tender documents.

    Despite the glaring irregularities, the Finance Ministry nevertheless approved the list of suppliers submitted by Agriculture Ministry due to "urgent demand for paddy seeds" and "urgency factor for the current planting season", the letter states.

    The approval however was subject to the companies complying with the financial regulations, key performance indicators and that their selling price should not exceed the ceiling price of RM2.43 per kg.

    The letter also called on the Agriculture Ministry to observe procurement procedures and tender criteria in future procurement.

    'Errant' suppliers not named

    The tender to supply padi seeds to farmers for two years - from 2013 to 2014 - was estimated to cost RM164.8 million and were parceled out to 10 bumiputera companies.

    However, the Finance Ministry letter did not pinpoint which of the 10 suppliers failed to meet the tender criteria.

    Contacted byMalaysiakini, Mahfuz (right), who is the MP for Pokok Sena, called on both the Finance Ministry and Agriculture Ministry to state the criteria that had not been met by the suppliers.

    "But why did the ministry then still gave them the tenders? This is abuse of power. When the suppliers do not meet the criteria, the padi seeds supplied will not meet the required quality and standard.

    "The government has announced incentives for farmers who achieve high yields, but if the seeds are sub-standard, how can they achieve high yields to be eligible for the incentives?" Mahfuz asked.

    Malaysiakini has also spotted an anonymous article, titled ‘Skandal Padi Benih Yang Terburuk Dalam Sejarah Industri Padi/Beras Negara' (The worst padi seeds scandal in the history of the national padi industry), which has been widely circulated on the Internet since last month, making more allegations related to the tender issue.

    The writer, who signed the letter as an 'Anxious Member of MOA [Agriculture Ministry]', claimed that the 20,000 tonnes quota of padi seeds - the biggest chunk - was tailored for two specific companies - Kilang Beras Seri Merbok Sdn Bhd and Haji Md Nor bin Haji Abd Rahmah (M) Sdn Bhd (HMN).

    Company defends tender

    According to the list of successful tenderers published by Agriculture Ministry on its official website, Seri Merbok was given a quota of 22,000 tonnes while HMN was given a tender to supply 20,000 tonnes.

    The other eight suppliers were only given supply quotas of 2,000 tonnes, 3,000 tonnes or 8,000 tonnes each.

    According to the Finance Ministry letter, Seri Merbok was given two separate quotas of 20,000 tonnes and 2,000 tonnes of padi seeds, making its total quota 22,000 tonnes - the highest among all suppliers.

    Seri Mernok and HMN have together taken up 52.5 percent of the total annual quota for the supply of 80,000 tonnes of padi seeds given out by Agriculture Ministry.

    HMN manager Mansor Md Nor, when contacted byMalaysiakini, conceded that his company did not meet one of the tender criteria, but he defended the award of the tender.

    However, a Seri Merbok spokesperson declined to comment. He said queries on the matter were best answered by the Finance Ministry.


Visitors found this page by searching for:

kilang beras seri merbok sdn bhd

kilang beras seri merbok

scandal kilang urc

padi pioneer

kilang urc

nombor telefon kilang seri merbok

kilang padi hmnno telefon kilang beras seri merbokkilang padiNo talefon kilang padi merbokHarapkan pegar pegar mkn padopemilik kilang beras merbokBERAS SERI MERBOK SDN BHD SIAPA PEMILIKnombor telefon kilang beras seri merbokaward frm agriculture minister pagarkilang beras merbokplanting paddy seedyou tube harapkan pagar pagar makn padibiodata kilang beras seri merbokkilang beras seri merbok sdn bhd contactHaji Md Nor bin Haji Abd Rahmah (M) Sdn Bhdscandal kilang beras seri merbok sdn bhdkilang hj md nor
SEO Blog

Tags for this Thread


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts